Estimation of Inputs to Florida Bay

Comparison of Observed & Predicted Inflows from Florida Mainland

Project Index

Introduction  |  Measured Flows  |  Taylor Slough  |  Coastal Basin  |  Total Flows  |    Correlations with Salinity


Introduction

This section compares observed and predicted inflows to the Florida Bay region from the Florida Bay mainland for 1996-1997.  Methods for predicting inflows are described in a separate section.

Measured Flows

Observed values are based upon measurements made by the U.S. Geological Survey.   Station locations are shown on the attached map (symbols labeled as "outflow stations").   Periods of record and links to project descriptions are provided below:

Starting Dates

Location

Station

Flow

Quality

Northeast Florida Bay

McCormick Creek

MCC

10/01/95

12/17/95

Trout Creek

TRT

02/01/96

03/20/96

Mud Creek

MUD

10/15/95

03/20/96

Taylor River

TAY

10/01/95

03/20/96

Highway Creek East of US-1*

HWYE

01/22/96

03/20/96

West Highway Creek

WHWY

02/09/96

03/20/96

Jewfish Creek *

JEWF

1997

06/13/97

Southwest Florida Coast

Shark River *

SHK

10/07/96

02/19/97

Harney *

HRN

10/01/96

02/26/97

Broad *

BRD

12/13/96

02/27/97

* measured flows not currently available

Flow data from the Northeast Florida Bay sites are available in provisional form.   Flow data from the Southwest Coastal sites are not yet available (stage measurements and water quality only).  Given the diffuse nature of the inflows, these specific monitoring points may not reflect all of the freshwater inflows from the Mainland. 

Measured flows were available in yearly data files containing 15-minute unit values.  Monthly flow volumes have been computed for each station using the following procedure:

  1. Compute average daily flow rate from non-missing 15-minute values within each day.

  2. Compute average monthly flow rate from non-missing daily-average flows in each month.

  3. Compute monthly total flow volume as the average monthly flow rate times the number of days in each month.

Negative flow values were common at most sites.  These were treated the same as positive flows.  Results estimate the net outflow for each station and month.

The following analysis focuses on inflows to Northeast Florida Bay from the Taylor Slough and Coastal Basins.  The following map shows basin boundaries, flow stations, and water quality stations:

map_qtc.gif (33643 bytes)

Results for inflows to the Southwest Coast will be considered when observed flows are available.

Taylor Slough Basin

Flow monitoring stations in the Taylor Slough basin included the Taylor River, McCormick Creek, and Mud Creek.  The following figure shows the observed monthly flow for each station, the total observed flow, and the total predicted outflow:

qobs_t.gif (8410 bytes)

Coastal Basin

Flow monitoring stations in the Coastal Basin included  Trout River, and West Highway Creek.  Measured flows for East Highway Creek and Jewfish Creek are not currently available.  The following figure shows the observed monthly flow for each station, the total observed flow, and the total predicted outflow:

qobs_c.gif (10473 bytes)

Comparison of Observed & Predicted Total Flows

The following table lists observed and predicted flows for the February 1996-November 1997 period when measured flows were reported at each station:

Station

Descripton

Flow (kac-ft)

Observed Flows

MUD

Mud Creek

-55.6

TRT

Trout Creek

300.5

MCC

McCormick Creek

6.1

TAY

Taylor River

28.6

WHWY

West Highway Creek

66.6

HYWE

East Highway Creek

No Data

Total

343.3

Predicted Flows

Taylor Slough Basin

483.7

Coastal Basin

243.5

Total

727.2

Taylor Slough

MCC+TAY+MUD

-21.0

Predicted

483.7

Coastal Basin

TRT + WHWY

364.3

Predicted

243.5

The total predicted flow exceeds the total measured flow by more than a factor of two.  The large difference is attributed primarily to the Taylor Slough basin.   The differences may partially reflect outflows from the basin occurring at locations which were not gauged.   Differences could also be attributed to the fact that measured flows reflect surface values only, whereas predicted flows reflect the sum of surface and groundwater discharges.  The provisional nature of the observed flow data may also be a factor.

Correlations with Salinity

The following table lists product-moment correlation coefficients between monthly-average salinity values measured by FIU at coastal stations and the monthly flows plotted above:

   

Taylor Slough Basin

Coastal Basin

 

Station

 

FLAB11

FLAB12

FLAB07

FLAB08

FLAB10

             

Taylor Slough

Jan 1996 - Nov 1997

     

Predicted Flow

-0.63

-0.54

     

Observed Flow

0.17

-0.13

     
             

Coastal Basin

March 1996 - Nov 1997

     

Predicted Flow

   

-0.83

-0.85

-0.76

Observed Flow

   

-0.73

-0.56

-0.48

Monthly mean salinity values at stations FLAB11 and FLAB12 are plotted against observed and predicted outflows from Taylor Slough below:

sal_t_o.gif (4289 bytes) sal_t_p.gif (4280 bytes)

Monthly mean salinity values at stations FLAB07, FLAB08 and FLAB10 are plotted against observed and predicted outflows from the Coastal Basin below:

sal_c_o.gif (4676 bytes) sal_c_p.gif (4537 bytes)

In each case, salinity values are more strongly correlated with predicted flows than with the sum of measured outflows in each basin.  This supports the use of predicted flows in preliminary calibration of the water quality model.  Possible adjustments to the predicted basin outflows based upon the above comparisions should be considered in Phase II of this project. 

Project Index

http://www.shore.net/~wwwalker/flabay/obsflow.htm      Updated:  03/30/02