DMSTA Application to 
PSTA Field-Scale Test Facility

3/25/2003

 

DMSTA Home Page

 

  Site Photos 

  Concentration Time Series

  Load Time Series

Dataset Summary

Comparison of Calibrated K values with other PSTA datasets

Unit Area P Fluxes 

Sensitivity Analyses  ( FSC-1)    Outflow Seepage  (0, .1, .2)       Stirred Tanks (3, 9, 25)

Calibration Summary Prototype
Calibration*
Mass
Balances
CSTR's Calibrated K (m/yr)
Cell Description 12/01 - 11/02 8/02 - 11/02
FSC-1 Limerock

  ~ NEWS

9

  12

  16

FSC-2 Limerock/High-Velocity

  > SAV_C4

25

  26

  29

FSC-3 Caprock / Scraped

  ~ SAV_C4

4.2

  20

  33

FSC-4 Peat

  ~ EMERG

9

  8

  8

* Observations compared with simulations using parameter sets employed in SFWMD Basin Feasibility Studies (EMERG, NEWS, SAV_C4).

All calibrations assume  C0 = 4 ppb,  C1 = 22 ppb, Zx = 0 cm.  Hydraulic parameters calibrated separately for each cell to match observed outflow and depth time series.   Calibration procedures identical to those applied to other DMSTA data sets

K = 23 m/yr for PSTA Prototype dataset (ENRP South Test Cell 8)

 

 


Some Observations:

  • FSC 1-3 calibrations are within the range of other PSTA platforms on substrates other than peat.
     
  • FSC-1  performance is similar to NEWS calibration based upon ENR Cell 4 & ENRP South Test Cell 8.
     
  • FSC-2  performance is superior to the  NEWS, PSTA, or SAV_C4 calibrations.  The improved performance relative to the ENRP STC-8 (basis for PSTA & NEWS calibrations) may be related to effects of velocity (.18  vs. .02 cm/sec), hydraulic load (15 vs. 6 cm/d), or initial substrate P content (~100 vs. ~800 mg/kg, CH2MHill Ex 3-36).
     
  • FSC-3  performance is similar to SAV_C4 and superior to FSC-2 (K = 33 vs. 29 m/yr).  
     
  • FSC-4 (Peat) performance is similar to the emergent calibration (Boney Marsh).  This is consistent with data from other PSTA platforms with a peat substrate.
     
  • FSC-2  performs better than FSC-1 (K = 29 vs. 16 m/yr), even when adjusted for differences in hydraulics (TIS = 25 vs. 9) and seepage.  The TIS difference accounts for ~1 ppb difference in predicted outflow concentration. The higher K rate for FSC-2 is consistent with the higher observed P storage in periphyton biomass (250 vs. 100 mg/m2, CH2 draft Ex 2-8).  Differences in performance could be related to effects of (1) velocity  (0.18 vs. 0.02 cm/sec);  (2) hydraulic load (15 vs. 12 cm/d);  (3) P load (1900 vs. 1400 mg/m2-yr); and/or (4) depth (20 vs. 27 m/yr).  Effects of velocity cannot be inferred directly by comparing FSC-2 & FSC-1 because they were operated at different hydraulic loads & depths.
     
  • FSC 1-3 performance improved in the second operating period (after dryout), as measured by K values and residual time series.  This general pattern was also observed in the ENRP PSTA test cells on shellrock. 
     
  • Simulated mass balances indicate that storage increase (P accumulation in biomass) accounted for  63-77% of the net phosphorus uptake between July 2001 & November 2002.  This suggests that the systems did reach steady-state (mat communities may not have fully developed) & is consistent with improved performance in the later (post-dryout, August-Nov 2002) calibration period.
     
  • The model tends to over-predict outflow concentrations during periods of high loading and to under-predict concentrations during period of low loading.  Refinements of the model calibration and/or structure may be needed to improve the simulations.  However, this pattern may be related to P releases from initial substrates, which are not reflected in the simulations.
     
  • Calibrated net outflow seepage rates are 0.1, 0.13, 0.01, and 0.22 cm/day/cm for  FSC 1, 2 & 4, respectively.
     
  • Calibration of FSC-2 may be influenced by inflow seepage from adjacent FSC-1.  If all of the latter is assumed to enter FSC-2 (uniformly distributed), the calibrated K value for FSC-2 increases from 29 to 35 m/yr.
  • FSC-1 performance is moderately sensitive to seepage rates over a range of 0 to 0.2 cm/day/cm; the calibrated value (0.1) is relatively well-determined based upon observed outflow volume & depth time series.
     
  • Simulations assume that outflow seepage is distributed uniformly over each cell.  If all of the seepage is assumed to occur in the inlet region, calibrated K values decrease from 16 to 13 m/yr in FSC-1  and from 29 to 23 m/yr in FSC-2.
     
  • Effects of P loading from initial substrates may be reflected by the following performance ranking of K values for PSTA datasets:   [Raceway / FS Scraped / PP-NoSubstrate]  >  [ Shellrock / Limerock ]  >  Peat.
     
  • Extrapolation of FSC calibrations to full-scale systems may depend upon whether the relatively shallow depths (<~ 40 cm)  can be maintained while passing peak flows through the STA's.   
     

 

 

K Values Calibrated to PSTA Datasets

 

 

Phosphorus Fluxes

 

 

 

 

Data Summary

 


DMSTA Home Page

http://www.wwwalker.net/dmsta/track/psta_fsc/index.htm                  03/25/2003